Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/30/2003

State v. Hunt

Citations

69 P.3d 571
275 Kan. 811
2003 Kan. LEXIS 292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that juries “usually attach great weight to eyewitness identification, while others involved in a trial know and other disciplines have documented that such identification is often unreliable”
noting that juries “usually attach great weight to eyewitness identification, while others involved in a trial know and other disciplines have documented that such identification is often unreliable”
adopting “refin[ed]” Biggers factors that retain focus on the witness’s opportunity to view and the “[s]pontaneity” of the identification
adopting “refin[ed]” Biggers factors that retain focus on the witness’s opportunity to view and the “[s]pontaneity” of the identification
expanding Biggers factors because of the great weight jurors attach to eyewitness identification and the studies documenting its unreliability
adopting the Ramirez constitutional analysis before its clarification in Antonio Lujan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gernon, Abbott, Brazil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.