State v. Hughes

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 8250

Syllabus

Trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that DNA testing would not be outcome determinative in defendant's case, and therefore in denying his application for DNA testing. Trial court was not required to wait for defendant's untimely reply to the State's memorandum in opposition to DNA testing, despite defendant's having filed a \notice of intent\ to file a reply by a date that was long past the deadline. Judgment affirmed.