Skip to main content

State v. Huerta

Citations

  • 38 So. 3d 883
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9133
  • 2010 WL 2507057

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, as long as the sentence imposed does not exceed the legal maximum, a claim of alleged scoresheet error is not cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800
  • rejecting defendant’s argument that state appeal from resentencing order was untimely; state not required to appeal from earlier order granting rule 3.800 motion because judicial labor was not complete until resen-tencing
  • finding appeal was not cognizable under rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence
  • state's time for appeal began to run once resentencing occurred, not when the court granted 3.800(a) motion
  • “[W]here there is a plea agreement on the conviction and length of sentence to be imposed, . . . the sentencing guidelines are not applicable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cope, Shepherd, Suarez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.