District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/8/1999
State v. Delvalle
Citations
- 745 So. 2d 541
- 1999 WL 1115432
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding an order granting the defendant's rule 3.800(a) motion was not a final order where the defendant had not been resentenced and judicial labor was still required
- “The order granting the Defendant’s 3.800(a) motion is not a final order, as judicial labor, i.e., resentencing, is still required.”
- “The order granting the Defendant’s 3.800(a) motion is not a final order, as judicial labor, i.e., resentencing, is still required.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ace Patterson v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2017-03-03· cited 113×
- State v. GainesSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-11-02· cited 41×
- State v. RudolfDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-10· cited 9×
- Ace Patterson v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2016-01-29· cited 9×
- State v. HuertaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-23· cited 8×
- Jordan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-03-06· cited 8×
- Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-21· cited 8×
- Anthony Joseph Farina v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2016-05-12· cited 3×
- Darryl Len Morgan v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2022-11-03
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.