State v. Hudson

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 1403

Syllabus

Anders appeal. Trial counsel did not render ineffective assistance by not moving for acquittal on four counts. The state offered sufficient evidence on all elements of these offenses to warrant submitting them to the jury. Trial counsel was not ineffective by not filing a motion to suppress based on the insufficiency of the search warrant the record shows little basis on which to question the warrant's sufficiency. The trial court did not err by overruling appellant's post-trial motion for judgment of acquittal on a charge of endangering children based on illegal manufacture of drugs. There was sufficient evidence that appellant knew that methamphetamine was being manufactured in the residence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), there are no arguably meritorious issues to present on appeal. Judgment affirmed.