State v. Hudson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Questions of consent, force, resistance and fear are particularly within the province of the jury to determine.” [ ] (citing Berezovsky v. State, 335 So. 2d 592, 593 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)), rev’d in part on other grounds, 350 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 1977)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Amaro
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-08-31· cited 16×
• State v. Carda
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-10-14· cited 9×
• State v. Clyatt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-20· cited 8×
• 2D13-2712 / Shrader v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-09-07
• GEORGE O. SHRADER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-08-23
• Owens v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-18
• Gautreaux v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-12

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-01-20· cited 34×
• Thomas v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1964-09-16· cited 19×
• Berezovsky v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-05-18· cited 14×
• Berezovsky v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-09-15· cited 11×
• State v. Bryant
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-07-31· cited 10×
• State v. Hires
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-06-15· cited 8×