· 3/20/2008
State v. Clyatt
Citations
- 976 So. 2d 1182
- 2008 WL 731545
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \We see no distinction between the use of circumstantial evidence to prove state of mind in these contexts and the State's attempted use of circumstantial evidence to prove the victim's lack of consent in this battery case.\
- “We see no distinction between the use of circumstantial evidence to prove state of mind in these contexts and the State’s attempted use of circumstantial evidence to prove the victim’s lack of consent in this battery case.”
- \We see no distinction between the use of circumstantial evidence to prove state of mind in these contexts and the State's - 18 - attempted use of circumstantial evidence to prove the victim's lack of consent in this battery case.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lawson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.