State v. Hubbard
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2150
Syllabus
Postsentence; motion to withdraw; Crim.R. 32.1; abuse of discretion; manifest injustice; res judicata; DNA; ineffective assistance of counsel. Judgment affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's second, postsentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea where defendant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel were barred by res judicata and defendant could not show a manifest injustice from counsel's failure to attend DNA collection.
Judges: Forbes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. XieOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-12· cited 1,682×
- State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court· 2010-08-25· cited 314×
- State v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-08· cited 95×
- State v. HinesOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-27· cited 15×
- State v. SimmonsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-13· cited 8×
- State v. NicholsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.