State v. Hoyt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• under former RCW 9A.56.010(12)(c) (1975), review denied, 129 Wn.2d 1004 (1996), a series of third degree thefts committed pursuant to a common scheme or plan may be aggregated into a single count of either first degree theft or second degree theft

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hudson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-08-29· cited 33×
• State v. Turner
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-08-28· cited 29×
• State v. Turner
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-10-13· cited 26×
• State v. Kinneman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-12-29· cited 24×
• State v. Carosa
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-08-29· cited 8×
• State of Washington v. Gary Bruce Farnworth
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2017-06-01· cited 4×
• Coluccio v. King County
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-04-29· cited 4×
• Coluccio v. King County
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-05-31· cited 3×
• State v. Farnworth
  Washington Supreme Court· 2018-12-06· cited 3×
• State v. Kinneman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-02-20

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Johnson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-05-21· cited 272×
• State v. Meyer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-05-07· cited 18×