State v. Howell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Jurisdiction depends upon the state of affairs existing at the time it is invoked ... and once having attached is not lost by subsequent events.”
• subject matter “^jurisdiction depends upon the state of affairs existing at the time it is invoked, and once having attached is not lost by subsequent events”
• authority derived from A.R.S. § 12-120.21

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Avila
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-12-04· cited 48×
• Fry v. Garcia
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-07-03· cited 26×
• Resolution Trust Corp. v. Foust
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-03-18· cited 21×
• State v. Villados
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1974-03-27· cited 18×
• State v. Mallory
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-12-21· cited 12×
• State v. Thompson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-01-12· cited 3×
• State of Arizona v. Javier Fimbres
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-08-07

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Mileham
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-03-08· cited 27×
• State v. Mileham
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-05-19· cited 19×
• Atlantic Corporation v. United States of America
  First Circuit· 1962-12-31· cited 17×
• State v. Court of Appeals, Division I
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1968-06-05· cited 17×
• Gardner v. Gardner
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-10-29· cited 16×