Fry v. Garcia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that parents’ marriage divested court of jurisdiction to hear grandparent visitation issue when the court had jurisdiction before marriage at the time of filing
• “The superior court correctly denied this portion of the Rule 60 motion as time-barred because Mother did not file the motion within six months from the court’s last order . . . .”
• “For a statute to divest the superior court of jurisdiction, even in the broader sense of authority to act, the legislature must declare its intent to create divestiture ‘explicitly and clearly.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).