State v. Howard

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 4501

Syllabus

After conducting an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no issue with arguable merit for appellant to advance on appeal. Contrary to appellant's suggestion otherwise, the trial court was not required to make the consecutive-sentence findings required by R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) when resentencing appellant to an additional three-year firearm specification pursuant to R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(g). Judgment affirmed.