Skip to main content

State v. Boyd

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 1902

Syllabus

Appellant fails to show that trial counsel was ineffective for not seeking to suppress evidence of the one-man show-up identification conducted by police. The evidence in the record supports a conclusion that the identification was reliable and that counsel's decision not to seek suppression did not prejudice appellant. Appellant's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not err by ordering appellant to serve consecutive sentences or by imposing a third consecutive 3-year sentence for a firearm-specification. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.