Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/2/2017
State v. Howard
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 8020
Syllabus
The trial court did not commit error in its constitutional and nonconstitutional advisements given to the Defendant-Appellant pursuant to Crim.R. 11. Further, the trial court did not commit error by denying Defendant-Appellant's motion to withdraw his pleas. Judgments affirmed.
Judges: Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 788×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. GriggsOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-08· cited 395×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2011-07-13· cited 344×
- State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-08-24· cited 291×
- State v. FrancisOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-22· cited 197×
- State v. BarkerOhio Supreme Court· 2011-08-24· cited 131×
- Taylor v. First Resolution Invest. Corp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-06-16· cited 50×
- In re NowakOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-17· cited 48×
- State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-29· cited 13×
- State v. PhillipsOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-17· cited 10×
- State v. GasparenoOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-14· cited 9×
- State v. YoungerOhio Court of Appeals· 1975-11-20· cited 8×
- State v. FantauzziOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-19· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.