Skip to main content

State v. Howard

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 8020

Syllabus

The trial court did not commit error in its constitutional and nonconstitutional advisements given to the Defendant-Appellant pursuant to Crim.R. 11. Further, the trial court did not commit error by denying Defendant-Appellant's motion to withdraw his pleas. Judgments affirmed.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.