Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/31/1976
State v. Howard
Citations
- 554 P.2d 1282
- 27 Ariz. App. 339
- 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 612
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Although a prosecutor, when he finds it necessary to testify on behalf of the prosecution, should withdraw, he has no such duty when called on behalf of the defendant.” (citations omitted)
- “Although it is generally held that a prosecutor is competent to testify in a criminal case for the State even though he is engaged in the prosecution of the case, courts have generally disapproved the practice except in the extraordinary circumstances.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Krucker, Howard, Hathaway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-11-07· cited 53×
- State v. TuzonArizona Supreme Court· 1978-01-09· cited 40×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa· 1977-06-29· cited 40×
- State v. LindenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-02-17· cited 22×
- People v. Superior Court (Hollenbeck)California Court of Appeal· 1978-08-31· cited 17×
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court· 1983-04-28· cited 9×
- State v. McClellanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-04-10· cited 5×
- State v. JenkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1986-07-09· cited 4×
- Graphic Process Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-07-17· cited 4×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chessman v. TeetsSupreme Court· 1957-06-10· cited 171×
- The People v. GendronIllinois Supreme Court· 1968-11-22· cited 88×
- Loren R. Gajewski and Mervin A. Gajewski v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1963-08-26· cited 84×
- Caryl Chessman v. Harley O. Teets, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1956-11-28· cited 56×
- Frank v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1949-02-11· cited 55×
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Missouri· 1971-12-13· cited 36×
- People v. SpencerSupreme Court of Colorado· 1973-07-02· cited 34×
- Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1969-10-27· cited 32×
- United States v. MaloneyW.D. Pennsylvania· 1965-05-13· cited 26×
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1962-03-07· cited 24×
- Cummings v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1927-10-11· cited 23×
- State v. StiltnerWashington Supreme Court· 1962-12-27· cited 21×
- State v. FackrellWashington Supreme Court· 1954-06-17· cited 21×
- Tomlin v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1965-11-24· cited 20×
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1960-03-05· cited 19×
- The PEOPLE v. McCoyIllinois Supreme Court· 1970-01-28· cited 19×
- People v. NelsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1967-11-17· cited 11×
- Broxton v. DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1955-05-27· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.