Skip to main content

State v. Housley

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 4489

Syllabus

Following his conviction on several drug offenses, appellant filed a pro se motion in the trial court to stay fines and court costs. The court overruled the motion, finding that no fines had been imposed and that appellant had not shown good cause to stay the collection of court costs. The \bill\ for court costs issued by the clerk of courts is not part of the record before us, and the court was not required to hold a hearing on appellant's ability to pay court costs. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Donovan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.