Skip to main content

State v. Housler

Citations

  • 167 S.W.3d 294
  • 2005 Tenn. LEXIS 627
  • 2005 WL 1653719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a transcript used during trial was properly includable although it was never introduced as an exhibit
  • holding that a transcript that had not been properly admitted into evidence but had been considered and relied upon by the trial court was reviewable by the appellate court under Tennessee Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(g
  • concerning a transcript of a separate trial used by both sides and the trial judge during trial and put before the court for, consideration, although it was never admitted into evidence
  • “The trial court is in the best position to determine those matters necessary to provide a fair, accurate, and complete account of the proceedings upon which the appeal is based.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice Janice M. Holder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.