Skip to main content

State v. Hooks

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 4132

Syllabus

R.C. 2941.1410(A) provides an exception to the Major Drug Offender (\MDO\) specification requirement where an offender is charged pursuant to R.C. 2925.03. Therefore, appellant's counts did not require R.C. 2925.1410(A) MDO specifications. The Google Maps images and detective's testimony adequately identified the premises upon which the high school is situated and outlined property boundaries for purposes of a school premises enhancement. The toxicologists' testimony regarding their credentials and the scientific testing they performed rendered their testimony compliant with the strictures of Evid.R. 702. Finally, appellant failed to identify prejudice resulting from alleged errors.

Judges: M. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.