Supreme Court of Kansas· 12/20/2013
State v. Holt
Citations
- 298 Kan. 531
- 314 P.3d 870
- 2013 WL 6714056
- 2013 Kan. LEXIS 1308
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \Appellants seeking reversal on the grounds that they are denied due process because of an inaccurate or incomplete transcript must make the best feasible showing possible that a complete and accurate transcript might have changed the outcome of the appeal.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Creitz, Moritz, Rosen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court· 1977-04-27· cited 4,812×
- Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 837×
- Entsminger v. IowaSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 232×
- State v. Rojas-MarcelenoSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-09-21· cited 229×
- United States v. Henry SelvaFifth Circuit· 1977-09-28· cited 167×
- State v. HerbelSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-04-05· cited 154×
- Al-Ghorbani v. HolderSixth Circuit· 2009-11-09· cited 148×
- Jose Ortiz-Salas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceSeventh Circuit· 1993-04-22· cited 63×
- United States v. Thomas Elbert CashwellEleventh Circuit· 1992-01-09· cited 57×
- Kheireddine v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2005-10-25· cited 53×
- United States v. Dennis L. WilsonNinth Circuit· 1994-02-16· cited 47×
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-03-04· cited 22×
- Curro v. WatsonE.D. New York· 1995-04-28· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.