State v. Frantz
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1833
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by considering appellant's dismissed aggravated robbery charges at sentencing the trial court is permitted to consider evidence at sentencing that does not strictly relate to the convicted offense. In addition, the trial court did not offend the constitution by applying the indefinite sentencing scheme established under the Reagan Tokes Law. This court has consistently rejected arguments claiming that the Reagan Tokes Law violates the separation-of-powers doctrine and the right to due process and that the law is unconstitutionally vague. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.