State v. Holt
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 6649
Syllabus
Hearing on motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to search warrant was not required where appellant did not allege false allegations in search warrant affidavit. Probable cause for warrant existed where two confidential informants provided specific dates and locations of drug activity they witnessed, which was corroborated by police surveillance and items retrieved in trash pull. Trial court properly denied motion to reveal identities of confidential informants without a hearing.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court· 1989-09-27· cited 672×
- City of Xenia v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-22· cited 509×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1995-08-16· cited 250×
- State v. ShindlerOhio Supreme Court· 1994-08-10· cited 223×
- State v. CastagnolaOhio Supreme Court· 2015-04-28· cited 136×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1983-03-30· cited 118×
- State v. CodeluppiOhio Supreme Court· 2014-04-17· cited 110×
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 2015-02-12· cited 75×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-09-20· cited 27×
- State v. MarcellinoOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-25· cited 13×
- State v. A.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-27· cited 4×
- State v. CorwinOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.