State v. Holt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• new trial is not required unless jury’s unauthorized use of dictionary is calculated to prejudice defendant’s rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sinegal
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1981-01-26· cited 51×
• State v. Kiehn
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1972-08-29· cited 42×
• Wernsing v. General Motors Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-02-03· cited 40×
• United States v. Charles Douglas Steele, AKA Miles Sherman
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-03-24· cited 34×
• State v. Hughes
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-11-23· cited 30×
• State v. Wilkins
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-08-23· cited 28×
• State v. Brown
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1969-07-03· cited 19×
• State v. Finney
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-07-27· cited 18×
• State v. Boykin
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-11-16· cited 15×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pulkrabek Ex Rel. Pulkrabek v. Lampe
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1956-02-29· cited 19×
• State v. English
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1919-04-18· cited 6×
• State v. Waitman
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1919-05-13· cited 5×