South Dakota Supreme Court· 11/16/1988
State v. Boykin
Citations
- 432 N.W.2d 60
- 1988 S.D. LEXIS 162
- 1988 WL 122122
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that ‘‘[t]he standard set forth by the United States Supreme Court in [Remmer I], is controlling . . . [i]n a crimi- nal case’’ and that ‘‘South Dakota case law is entirely consistent with [Remmer I]’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MoellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-05-22· cited 85×
- State v. MiskiminsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-01-25· cited 40×
- State v. Blue ThunderSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1991-02-20· cited 30×
- Boykin v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1991-05-29· cited 21×
- State v. LewandowskiSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-11-21· cited 20×
- Weiker v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-04-27· cited 18×
- State v. Red StarSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-05-02· cited 12×
- State v. PinelaSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-07-11· cited 2×
- State v. BerriosSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2016-01-26
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 2,732×
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 2,670×
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-03-08· cited 1,718×
- Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1975-06-16· cited 1,568×
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 1,404×
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1892-11-14· cited 1,086×
- Cruz v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 734×
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-10· cited 146×
- State v. HardingArizona Supreme Court· 1983-09-06· cited 111×
- Vivian Sprynczynatyk and Paul Sprynczynatyk, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Appellant/cross-AppelleeEighth Circuit· 1985-09-17· cited 97×
- United States v. James Lynn HootonNinth Circuit· 1981-11-30· cited 88×
- Wheaton v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1943-02-25· cited 84×
- State v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-08-03· cited 71×
- State v. SwallowSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-06-13· cited 65×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.