Washington Supreme Court· 8/22/1985

State v. Holt

Citations

704 P.2d 1189
104 Wash. 2d 315
1985 Wash. LEXIS 1263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

requiring a defendant to request a bill of particulars in order to preserve such a challenge on appeal
a criminal defendant can raise objections at any time to an information which completely fails to state an offense
a criminal defendant can raise objections at any time to an information which completely fails to state an offense
omission of any statutory element of a crime in the charging document is a defect requiring dismissal
omission of any statutory element of a crime in the charging document is a defect requiring dismissal
\the function of such a bill is to amplify or clarify particular matters essential to the defense\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pearson, Dolliver, Utter, Brachtenbach, Dore, Andersen, Callow, Goodloe, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.