State v. Holmes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[b]ecause a warrantless search is presumptively invalid, the state has the burden of affirmatively demonstrating a recognized exception to the warrant requirement”
• “[bjecause a warrantless search is presumptively invalid, the state has the burden of affirmatively demonstrating a recognized exception to the warrant requirement”
• ‘[b]ecause a warrantless search is presumptively invalid, the state has the burden of affirmatively demonstrating a recognized exception to the warrant requirement’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Nash
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-06-20· cited 43×
• State v. Aviles
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-02-21· cited 39×
• State v. Wright
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-06-06· cited 10×
• State v. Kendrick
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-12-13· cited 5×
• State v. Holmes
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-03-17

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Coolidge v. New Hampshire
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
• Texas v. Brown
  Supreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
• Harris v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1968-03-05· cited 1,768×
• Arizona v. Hicks
  Supreme Court· 1987-03-03· cited 1,525×
• Brown v. North Carolina
  Supreme Court· 1986-11-03· cited 227×
• State v. Badgett
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-07-08· cited 184×
• State v. Ruth
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-06-10· cited 127×
• State v. Ruscoe
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-07-25· cited 69×
• State v. Blackman
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-25· cited 36×
• State v. Bryant
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1989-09-05· cited 7×
• State v. Eady
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-07-21· cited 6×