Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/16/1987
State v. Holloman
Citations
- 731 P.2d 294
- 240 Kan. 589
- 1987 Kan. LEXIS 267
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that while evidence did not show a taking, it did show confinement by force or threat, thereby supporting kidnapping
- mere technical irregularity when duplicate of warrant, inventory of items seized given to defendant’s mother rather than defendant
- no suppression of evidence even though the inventory of items seized was given to defendant's mother, instead of defendant, in violation of K.S.A. 22-2512
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Herd, Lockett, Allegrucci
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BuggsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-03-06· cited 242×
- State v. Van CleaveSupreme Court of Kansas· 1986-03-28· cited 230×
- State v. White & StewartSupreme Court of Kansas· 1978-12-09· cited 60×
- State v. TillerySupreme Court of Kansas· 1980-03-01· cited 44×
- State v. HanksSupreme Court of Kansas· 1985-01-26· cited 44×
- State v. CoberlySupreme Court of Kansas· 1983-03-26· cited 42×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1986-02-21· cited 27×
- State v. WaughSupreme Court of Kansas· 1986-01-17· cited 27×
- State v. ChurchillSupreme Court of Kansas· 1982-06-11· cited 21×
- State v. BourneSupreme Court of Kansas· 1983-03-26· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.