Supreme Court of Iowa· 5/13/1992

State v. Holland

Citations

485 N.W.2d 652
1992 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 103
1992 WL 97540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding defendant could not show prejudice due to admission of evidence suggesting defendant had previously been convicted of a crime “because of the overwhelming evidence, albeit much of it circumstantial, connecting [the defendant] with the charged crimes”
holding defendant could not show prejudice due to admission of evidence suggesting defendant had previously been convicted of a crime “because of the overwhelming evidence, albeit much of it circumstantial, connecting [the defendant] with the charged crimes”
applying the same test when the jury, “through no fault of its own,” inadvertently saw the defendant’s work release card during its deliberations
providing the test without the “calculated to” component
finding error was harmless due to overwhelming evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Larson, Lavorato, Snell, Andreasen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.