Skip to main content

State v. Holden

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 2749

Syllabus

MOTION TO WITHDRAW PLEA – HYBRID REPRESENTATION: The trial court erred in denying defendant's request for a continuance for the presence of retained counsel where the record reflects that counsel filed a notice of appearance in the matter prior to the hearing on defendant's pro se post-conviction motion to withdraw his pleas. While defendant did not have a Sixth Amendment right to appointed counsel in post-conviction proceedings, defendant did have the right to have privately-retained counsel present. A trial court cannot entertain a pro se motion while defendant is represented by counsel where counsel does not join in with the motion, nor is defendant is entitled to simultaneous pro se representation and representation by counsel, which constitutes hybrid representation in violation of statute. Therefore, the trial court should have investigated whether newly-retained counsel joined defendant in defendant's pro se motion.

Judges: Hendon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.