Supreme Court of Minnesota· 11/2/1973
State v. Hogan
Citations
- 212 N.W.2d 664
- 297 Minn. 430
- 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1111
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that evidence of a scheme or plan was “inextricably bound together” with evidence of the immediate episode of the crime charged
- approving, in attempted murder trial, admission of books on “urban guerilla warfare” seized from defendant
- rejecting absolute rule that every minor is incapable and incompetent as a matter of law to waive his or her constitutional rights
- approving, in attempted murder trial, admission of books on \urban guerilla warfare\ seized from defendant
- finding 15-year-old to be of suitable intelligence and maturity to understand rights
- same totality-of-circumstances approach applies in determining validity of waiver of Miranda rights by juvenile
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Yetka, Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-03-13· cited 97×
- Firestone v. Crown Center Redevelopment Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri· 1985-06-25· cited 92×
- State v. SwainSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-06-23· cited 89×
- State v. LinderSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-07-14· cited 78×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-07-14· cited 74×
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-08-23· cited 71×
- Bangert v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-07-27· cited 69×
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-18· cited 64×
- In Re the Welfare of S. W. T.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-03-16· cited 62×
- State v. FratzkeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-08-17· cited 54×
- State v. FardanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-10-22· cited 54×
- State v. BromSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-11-30· cited 50×
- State v. LoydSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-11-02· cited 45×
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-06-04· cited 45×
- In Re Welfare of IQSSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-06-04· cited 43×
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-07-23· cited 42×
- People in Interest of LVASouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1976-12-16· cited 39×
- State v. OukSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-05-13· cited 37×
- State v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court· 1975-07-08· cited 33×
- State v. BurrellSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-05-19· cited 33×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-12-17· cited 368×
- People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-09-29· cited 352×
- Salsburg v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1954-01-18· cited 266×
- Lewis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1972-10-19· cited 175×
- State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-03-10· cited 160×
- Commonwealth v. MosesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-12-31· cited 56×
- State v. LoydSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-11-02· cited 45×
- People v. Stephen J. B.New York Court of Appeals· 1969-02-19· cited 43×
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1970-11-23· cited 41×
- O'NEIL v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1970-03-13· cited 27×
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-08-13· cited 25×
- State v. HardyArizona Supreme Court· 1971-12-01· cited 24×
- Jarrett v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1972-09-11· cited 23×
- State v. in the Interest of RWNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1971-06-30· cited 19×
- Story v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1969-03-26· cited 18×
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-06-18· cited 14×
- State v. ShevchukSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-12-27· cited 14×
- Jankord v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-04-23· cited 12×
- City of St. Paul v. HitzmannSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-02-09· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.