Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 2/11/1987

State v. Hoffman

Citations

  • 733 P.2d 502
  • 52 Utah Adv. Rep. 21
  • 1987 Utah LEXIS 653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant who failed to preserve objection to jury instructions waived it and may not renew it on appeal
  • holding that defendant who failed to preserve objection to jury instructions waived it and may not renew it on appeal
  • stating “plaintiff may challenge [statute’s] validity only to the extent the alleged basis of its infirmity is, or will be, applied to his detriment”
  • party may challenge statute only if basis of challenge would be, or is, applied to his detriment
  • party may challenge statute only if basis of challenge would be, or is, applied to his detriment
  • \'The constitutionality of a statute is considered in light of the standing of the [party] who raises the question and of its particular application in his case.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.