Court of Appeals of Washington· 5/6/1982
State v. Hoff
Citations
- 644 P.2d 763
- 31 Wash. App. 809
- 1982 Wash. App. LEXIS 2757
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the right to represent oneself is not essential for a fair trial, but protects defendant’s “personal right to be a fool”
- “In short, a pro se [party] is simply not entitled to special consideration.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Worswick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. FieldsFifth Circuit· 2007-04-02· cited 339×
- State v. SheppardWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-11-10· cited 55×
- State v. BebbCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-08-07· cited 30×
- State v. ToliasWashington Supreme Court· 1998-05-07· cited 28×
- State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-07-18· cited 24×
- State v. DrobelCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-07-10· cited 23×
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-10-09· cited 15×
- State v. RodriquezIdaho Court of Appeals· 1983-12-20· cited 13×
- State v. HavensCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-06-08· cited 9×
- State v. ReynoldsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-05-30· cited 6×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- State v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-09-25· cited 115×
- Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court· 1962-11-29· cited 114×
- State v. CharltonWashington Supreme Court· 1978-10-12· cited 70×
- State v. SwensonWashington Supreme Court· 1963-06-06· cited 61×
- State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1976-09-28· cited 50×
- State v. GayWashington Supreme Court· 1914-12-07· cited 50×
- State v. JessupCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-02-22· cited 46×
- United States v. Arthur Eugene PinkeyTenth Circuit· 1977-01-17· cited 38×
- People v. SalazarCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-11-09· cited 36×
- In Re the Welfare of CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-11-09· cited 28×
- Burstein v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1950-01-30· cited 22×
- State v. ForsythCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1975-04-07· cited 20×
- Mulka v. KeyesWashington Supreme Court· 1952-11-06· cited 19×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1967-11-09· cited 19×
- Sherman v. MobbsWashington Supreme Court· 1959-12-03· cited 13×
- Diimmel v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court· 1966-06-02· cited 12×
- State v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-08-01· cited 8×
- State v. ForbesWashington Supreme Court· 1968-09-12· cited 7×
- City of Bonney Lake v. DelanyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-12-14· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.