Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/7/1986
State v. Bebb
Citations
- 723 P.2d 512
- 44 Wash. App. 803
- 1986 Wash. App. LEXIS 3220
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[a] prosecutor can comment on the accused's failure to present evidence on a particular issue if persons other than the accused or his spouse could have testified for him on that issue\
- \[a] prosecutor can comment on the accused's failure to present evidence on a particular issue if persons other than the accused or his spouse could have testified for him on that issue\
- not improper to comment on defendant's failure to call handwriting expert or lay witness familiar with his handwriting to rebut State's expert testimony on handwriting
- self-representation is not a license to avoid compliance with court rules
- approved prosecutor's comment on defendant's failure to present handwriting testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson, McInturff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court· 1995-01-25· cited 498×
- State v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court· 2008-03-13· cited 121×
- State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 118×
- State v. BebbWashington Supreme Court· 1987-07-23· cited 77×
- State v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-04-15· cited 66×
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against GuarneroWashington Supreme Court· 2004-07-08· cited 56×
- City of Kennewick v. DayWashington Supreme Court· 2000-10-12· cited 55×
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against GuarneroWashington Supreme Court· 2004-07-08· cited 55×
- State v. ContrerasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-04-09· cited 49×
- State v. KendrickCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-05-11· cited 44×
- State v. Suarez-BravoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-01-04· cited 38×
- State v. EarlyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-06-10· cited 31×
- State Of Washington, V. Ronald MarkovichCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-08-02· cited 30×
- State v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-05-16· cited 8×
- City Of Seattle, V. Bill LangeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-07-06· cited 6×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-05-23· cited 6×
- State v. AdamskiCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-08-24· cited 2×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court· 1972-02-22· cited 26,103×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court· 1977-04-27· cited 4,812×
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- State v. Kwan Fai MakWashington Supreme Court· 1986-04-24· cited 348×
- State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court· 1984-12-28· cited 303×
- State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court· 1984-06-07· cited 231×
- Roscoe v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 212×
- City of Bellevue v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court· 1984-12-06· cited 166×
- State v. MilesWashington Supreme Court· 1970-01-29· cited 99×
- State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court· 1951-05-10· cited 73×
- State v. WicklundWashington Supreme Court· 1982-01-14· cited 54×
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court· 1976-12-23· cited 53×
- State v. AshbyWashington Supreme Court· 1969-10-02· cited 37×
- State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-07-18· cited 24×
- State v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court· 1974-11-14· cited 24×
- People v. RiceColorado Court of Appeals· 1978-02-02· cited 24×
- Sadowy v. MoranSupreme Court· 1951-10-15· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.