Supreme Court of North Carolina· 5/1/2020
State v. Hobbs
Syllabus
Appeal from convictions for first-degree murder, armed robbery, attempted armed robbery, and conspiracy to commit armed robbery whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that defendant failed to establish a prima facie case that the State was motivated by race in its use of peremptory challenges during jury selection.
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court· 2003-02-25· cited 27,550×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-03-08· cited 3,183×
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court· 1995-05-15· cited 3,008×
- Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 1,931×
- Snyder v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 2008-03-19· cited 1,296×
- Johnson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 1,022×
- Foster v. ChatmanSupreme Court· 2016-05-23· cited 461×
- Flowers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 2019-06-21· cited 355×
- King v. Bureau of Indian AffairsSupreme Court· 1997-10-06· cited 189×
- Michael McCray v. Robert AbramsSecond Circuit· 1984-12-04· cited 152×
- Buchbinder v. CommissionerSupreme Court· 1998-03-23· cited 127×
- Thompson v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationSupreme Court· 1997-10-06· cited 93×
- State v. GradySupreme Court of North Carolina· 2019-08-16· cited 80×
- Michigan v. BookerSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 26×
- State v. ParisiSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2019-08-16· cited 19×
- State v. TerrellSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2019-08-16· cited 8×
- State v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-07-17· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.