State v. Hobbs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Considering all the relevant factors, we conclude the trial court did not err in finding Defendant had failed to establish a prima facie showing for prospective jurors Layden and Humphrey.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cagle
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-07-02· cited 5×
• State v. Hobbs
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2020-05-01
• State v. Hobbs
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2023-04-06

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Batson v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
• Hernandez v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
• Williams v. Dormire
  Supreme Court· 2001-03-19· cited 167×
• Davis v. Curtis, Warden
  Supreme Court· 2002-10-07· cited 51×
• Von Brock v. Wilson, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 17×
• Patterson v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1997-03-24· cited 16×