State v. Hixson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• victim's prior criminal history is irrelevant for sentencing purposes because the defendant was unaware of the victim's history at the time of the shooting
• prosecutor does not breach plea agreement by advising court of witnesses who wish to testify at sentencing hearing
• prosecutor does not breach plea agreement by advising court of witnesses who wish to testify at sentencing hearing
• victim’s prior criminal history is irrelevant for sentencing purposes because the defendant was unaware of the victim’s history at the time of the shooting
• \[former] RCW 9.94A.110 mandates that the persons listed must be permitted to speak but does not limit the court's discretion in hearing from others\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Munguia
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-19· cited 23×
• State v. Lindahl
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-20· cited 13×
• State v. Lindahl
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-10-25· cited 8×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Alford
  Supreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
• State v. Post
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-09-10· cited 230×
• State v. Sledge
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-12-11· cited 170×
• State v. Mail
  Washington Supreme Court· 1993-06-17· cited 129×
• State v. Talley
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-01-08· cited 84×
• State v. Bell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-02-22· cited 26×
• State v. Gonzales
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-04-20· cited 25×
• State v. Coppin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-05-16· cited 25×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-05-29· cited 18×