State v. Hinton

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 963

Syllabus

Crim.R. 29; sufficiency of the evidence; manifest weight of the evidence; ineffective assistance of counsel; hearsay testimony; sentence contrary to law. The trial court did not err when it denied appellant's motion for acquittal under Crim.R. 29 because there was sufficient evidence to convict the appellant. Appellant's convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The appellant was not deprived of his right to effective assistance of counsel. The trial court did not allow inadmissible hearsay testimony. The appellant's sentence was not contrary to law.