Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1/28/2009
State v. Hinds
Citations
- 202 P.3d 187
- 225 Or. App. 470
- 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 56
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- assuming, without deciding, that an unlawful stop occurred before concluding that suppression was not required
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rosenblum, Brewer, Richardson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BertschCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-11· cited 24×
- State v. OlingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-29· cited 7×
- State v. Meza-GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-30· cited 7×
- State v. LowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-09· cited 7×
- State v. WynneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-09· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.