Skip to main content

State v. Hilton

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 3037

Syllabus

Res judicata consecutive sentences maximum findings H.B. 86 retroactive. - Appellant's appeal challenging his sentence as void because no findings were made prior to imposing maximum or consecutive sentences is barred by res judicata appellant could have made this argument on direct appeal or appeal after resentencing. H.B. 86 reviving judicial fact-finding was not retroactive.

Judges: Keough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.