State v. Hilton
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3037
Syllabus
Res judicata consecutive sentences maximum findings H.B. 86 retroactive. - Appellant's appeal challenging his sentence as void because no findings were made prior to imposing maximum or consecutive sentences is barred by res judicata appellant could have made this argument on direct appeal or appeal after resentencing. H.B. 86 reviving judicial fact-finding was not retroactive.
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.