State v. Hilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Assault and Battery with intent to kill requires a finding of a specific intent to kill.\
• “Assault and battery with intent to kill requires a finding of a specific intent to kill.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Foust
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-12-02· cited 63×
• State v. King
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-10-25· cited 44×
• State v. Coleman
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-06-26· cited 13×
• State v. Pilgrim
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-11-06· cited 11×
• State v. Pilgrim
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-03-03· cited 8×
• State v. Hilton
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-02-09· cited 8×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Beck v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 2,209×
• Keeble v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 1,048×
• State v. Hiott
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-03-03· cited 55×
• State v. Tuckness
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-12-14· cited 45×
• State v. Hyman
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-07-22· cited 40×
• State v. Funchess
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-10-18· cited 36×
• State v. White
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-07-01· cited 23×
• State v. Self
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1954-05-10· cited 17×
• State v. Mickle
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-04-16· cited 9×
• State v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-11-07· cited 5×
• State v. Burgess
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-01-03· cited 2×