State v. Hills

Citations

• 2026 Ohio 959

Syllabus

Per Mayle, J., although Hills claims that his plea was not knowingly or intelligently made because the trial court failed to inform him of potential consequences, our review of the record establishes that the trial court complied with the constitutional and procedural safeguards set out in Crim.R. 11 to ensure that his plea was knowingly and intelligently entered. As such, we find Hills' assignment of error not well-taken and affirm the Judgement Entry of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas.