Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/17/2017
State v. Hillman
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 8217
Syllabus
Judgment affirmed. Appellant's postconviction relief claims that his sentence is contrary to law and is therefore void, are untimely, barred by res judicata, and otherwise lack merit. In addition, the trial court has no duty to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on successive or untimely petitions for postconviction relief.
Judges: Horton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 802×
- State v. SzefcykOhio Supreme Court· 1996-11-13· cited 645×
- State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court· 1994-09-28· cited 454×
- State ex rel. George v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2008-06-11· cited 16×
- State v. SmothermanOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-13· cited 10×
- State v. DavicOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-07· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.