State v. Hill
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 373
Syllabus
Motion to withdraw plea Crim.R. 32.1 ineffective assistance of counsel abuse of discretion manifest injustice trial court lacked jurisdiction following affirmance of conviction and sentence. The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to withdraw plea because the trial court had no jurisdiction to consider appellant's motion after his conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,253×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- State ex rel. Special Prosecutors v. JudgesOhio Supreme Court· 1978-07-12· cited 377×
- State ex rel. Schneider v. KreinerOhio Supreme Court· 1998-09-23· cited 244×
- State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court· 2011-10-04· cited 81×
- State v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court· 2022-06-30· cited 42×
- State v. CrangleOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-09· cited 8×
- State v. SimmonsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-13· cited 8×
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-02· cited 5×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Cheselka (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-12-24· cited 5×
- State v. PanningOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-06· cited 3×
- In re Resignation of CheselkaOhio Supreme Court· 2021-02-01· cited 1×
- State v. LawsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.