State v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “evidence of complainant’s prior cohabitation with two men did not have sufficient probative value . . . to permit its introduction on the issue of whether or not she consented to sexual relations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Black
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-11· cited 102×
• State of Iowa v. Michael Cory Kelso-Christy
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2018-05-04· cited 71×
• State v. Herrera
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-04-25· cited 62×
• State v. Blalack
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-12-14· cited 52×
• State v. Hamilton
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-11-23· cited 25×
• State v. Ball
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1978-02-22· cited 20×
• State v. Ryan
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-03-14· cited 19×
• State v. Kobow
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-03-05· cited 18×
• State v. Saldana
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-09-03· cited 7×
• State v. Boykin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-04-08· cited 6×
• In Re Welfare of Larson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-05-20· cited 6×
• Williams v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1985-04-16· cited 4×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hembd
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-08-15· cited 22×
• State v. Gabler
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-06-30· cited 11×
• State v. Zaccardi
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-05-17· cited 6×
• State v. Warford
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-06-16· cited 1×