State v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prejudice was not established by the alleged failure to call witnesses in the absence of showing what the witnesses’ expected testimony would be or to investigate identification procedures in the absence of showing a defect in the procedures
• evidence found by police without a warrant in an inventory search of a vehicle lawfully in police custody was constitutionally admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Konfrst
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1996-12-06· cited 147×
• State v. Newman
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1996-06-07· cited 121×
• State v. Filkin
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-01-29· cited 92×
• State v. Coleman
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1992-01-10· cited 68×
• State v. Joubert
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-05-04· cited 23×
• State v. Stalder
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1989-04-21· cited 11×
• State v. Hurley
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1985-05-03

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• South Dakota v. Opperman
  Supreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
• State v. Opperman
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1976-11-12· cited 172×
• State v. Rice
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1983-06-03· cited 60×
• State v. Watts
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1981-07-02· cited 51×
• Marteney v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1981-12-11· cited 23×
• State v. Otey
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 18×
• State v. Hunt
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1982-07-30· cited 13×
• State v. Hill
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1979-11-13· cited 10×
• State v. Pope
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1983-03-04· cited 6×