State v. Filkin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that “‘no standard for the scope of the inventory other than the listing of every item of property would satisfy the relevant governmen­ tal interests’”
• explaining that law enforcement departments are not required to have inventory search policies in writing; however, State must prove that search was made pursuant to standardized procedures or established routine, or court must find such search unconstitutional
• suggesting “‘no standard for the scope of the inventory other than the listing of every item of property would satisfy the relevant governmental interests’”
• summarizing U.S. Supreme Court precedent as requiring that inventory searches, to be reasonable, must be conducted pursuant to standardized policies or established procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).