Skip to main content

State v. Hill

Citations

  • 449 N.W.2d 626
  • 1989 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 364
  • 1989 WL 153688

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a \fenced-in enclosure behind an automobile parts store\ met the definition of a structure under Iowa's burglary statute
  • finding more precise jury instruction would not have created a “reasonable probability the jury would have reached a different verdict”
  • finding a fenced enclosure behind an automobile parts store to be an appurtenance to a building and therefore within the first prong of the burglary definition
  • finding a fenced enclosure behind an automobile parts store to be an appurtenance to a building and therefore within the first prong of the burglary definition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter, Lavorato, Neuman, Snell, Andreasen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.