State v. Higgins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is axiomatic that on remand the trial court is constrained to follow ‘our specific directions as interpreted in light of the opinion.’” (quoting Coty v. Ramsey Assocs., 154 Vt. 168, 171, 573 A.2d 694, 696 (1990))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Gregory S. FitzGerald
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2020-02-28· cited 9×
• State v. Gibney
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2005-01-11· cited 6×
• State v. Gomes
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1996-08-06· cited 3×
• In Re Dousevicz, Inc. CU & Site Plan Approval (Kathleen Culpo, Appellants)
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2025-05-02· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Pearce
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
• State v. Hunt
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-10-21· cited 48×
• Coty v. Ramsey Associates, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-04-06· cited 32×
• State v. Higgins
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1986-11-14· cited 6×