State v. Gomes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that departure from law of the case doctrine is warranted if there has been a substantial change in evidence, or adherence to the previous decision would result in manifest injustice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tien Fu Hsu v. County of Clark
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2007-12-27· cited 90×
• In re Gregory S. FitzGerald
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2020-02-28· cited 9×
• Steven Daiello v. Town of Vernon v. Dale A. Merritt and Brenda Merritt
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2022-07-22· cited 6×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Starr
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-29· cited 545×
• In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Served Upon
  Sixth Circuit· 1986-02-27· cited 32×
• Coty v. Ramsey Associates, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-04-06· cited 32×
• State v. Gomes
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-07-01· cited 14×
• Holbert v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-08-13· cited 8×
• State v. Higgins
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-03-01· cited 7×