Court of Appeals of Utah· 8/25/1992
State v. Higgins
Citations
- 837 P.2d 9
- 194 Utah Adv. Rep. 55
- 1992 Utah App. LEXIS 144
- 1992 WL 207681
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that just because the policy language 1s complicated or confusing does not mean the prov1s10n m question 1s ambiguous
- seizure defined in Hodari D.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garff, Jackson, Russon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- State v. SeryCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1988-07-27· cited 213×
- State v. SchlosserUtah Supreme Court· 1989-05-17· cited 82×
- State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 77×
- State v. TalbotCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1990-05-09· cited 63×
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1990-07-18· cited 60×
- State v. TrujilloCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1987-06-19· cited 47×
- State v. StewardCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-02-06· cited 30×
- State v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-04-21· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.