Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/17/2018
State v. Hicks
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 1964
Syllabus
Guilty plea motion to withdraw ineffective assistance of counsel Crim.R. 32.1 hybrid representation. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to hold a hearing on appellant's pro se request to withdraw his guilty plea. Appellant was not denied his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. XieOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-12· cited 1,682×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1985-05-15· cited 1,185×
- State v. HesterOhio Supreme Court· 1976-02-04· cited 344×
- Wayne Ernest Barker v. United States of America, United States of America v. Wayne Ernest BarkerTenth Circuit· 1978-07-12· cited 182×
- State v. WashingtonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-05· cited 26×
- State v. WyleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-17· cited 19×
- State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-16· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.